Additional Material

Purpose

For ready-to-use sources and expected answers, start with the learner practice pack. It supplies three five-minute tasks with a fictional study extract, an authored AI-style response, prompt revision and an AI use record. The Extra Exercises give longer extension options.

Use this page for optional additions when you have extra time, a more confident cohort, or a strong local example to work with. The best extensions still deepen judgement rather than simply adding more AI content.

Optional Extensions by Theme

How AI changes research work

Ask groups to map where AI reduces effort and where it removes natural pauses for reflection.
Compare a research task completed manually, with AI support, and with over-reliance on AI.
Use a short case where speed improves output quantity but weakens checking discipline.

Documentation and workflows

Show a lightweight AI use note and ask what is missing.
Workflow design activity: where should AI help, where should it stop, and where should documentation happen?
Compare a sensible narrow agent idea with one that automates the wrong kind of judgement.

Optional Demonstrations

Demonstrate how a stronger prompt improves usefulness more than a role prompt alone.
Show how AI output changes when you move from “answer from memory” to “use only this source”.
Walk through a simple policy-checking workflow from source to summary to manual validation.

Useful Artefacts to Prepare

If you want richer discussion, bring one or more of the following:

a weak and strong prompt pair
an AI-generated summary with missing caveats
a short example of an AI use note or disclosure paragraph

Extension Design Principle

If time is limited, choose one richer case study with a strong debrief over several disconnected mini-tasks. In AI teaching, depth usually beats breadth.

Guidance to Recheck Before Delivery

Use the primary guidance table to revisit university, funder, publisher and research-integrity guidance. Record the sources you checked in the session plan. Discuss differences between roles and contexts rather than turning one organisation’s rule into a universal claim.